Google recently launched its new 45W USB-C charger alongside the Pixel 9 series. Although it didn’t take center stage at the Made by Google event, it has become a significant addition to Google’s lineup. Replacing the older 30W charger, the new 45W adapter is priced at $29.99 and offers better compatibility with the new Pixel 9 models, Pixel tablets, and even Chromebooks. But does it deliver on the promise of faster charging? Let’s dive into the benefits, disadvantages, and how it stacks up against other options in the market.
Benefits of the Google 45W USB-C Charger
- Increased Power Output:
The most notable upgrade is the jump from 30W to 45W, allowing it to provide more than enough power for the Pixel 9 series. The new charger is designed to support charging speeds of up to 37W, making it suitable for the Pixel 9 Pro XL, which requires higher power for optimal performance. - Wider Compatibility:
The additional power makes this charger versatile enough to power Pixel tablets and many Chromebooks. This broader compatibility makes it an excellent multi-purpose accessory for users with various Google devices. - Compact and Redesigned Form Factor:
Google has overhauled the look of the charger, giving it a rounded design. The USB-C port is now positioned on the underside rather than in line with the plug, making it easier to fit into wall sockets without crowding. - Improved Charging Efficiency:
While the charger’s actual power delivery varies between 32W and 37W depending on battery temperature and other factors, it charges a Pixel device from 0% to 50% in just 25 minutes. This makes it ideal for users who need a quick top-up before heading out.
Drawbacks of the Google 45W USB-C Charger
- Inconsistent Real-World Performance:
Despite its rated 45W output, the charger doesn’t consistently deliver that power throughout the entire charging cycle. During tests, it often dropped to as low as 2W, which is common due to adaptive charging but not optimal for those expecting a steady high-speed charge. - Not the Fastest in the Market:
Compared to other fast chargers, Google’s 45W option is relatively slow. The Pixel 9 Pro XL takes approximately 1 hour and 17 minutes to fully charge, which is behind competitors that can juice up devices in under an hour. - Price Point:
At $29.99, the Google 45W USB-C charger isn’t the most cost-effective option, especially when other brands like Anker offer similar or higher power chargers at a lower price point. - No USB-C Cable Included:
Unlike some other manufacturers, Google’s 45W charger doesn’t come with a bundled USB-C cable, adding an additional cost for users who don’t already own one.
How Does It Compare to Other Chargers?
- Google’s 30W Charger:
While Google’s older 30W charger is no longer available on their online store, the 45W charger offers a 50% increase in maximum power output. However, the real-world difference in charging times is minimal, especially for the Pixel 9 Pro, which is limited to just 27W. - Anker 45W Nano II Charger:
Anker’s 45W Nano II is a compact, travel-friendly alternative that often retails for less than $20. It’s smaller, lighter, and includes GaN technology for improved heat management and efficiency. - Samsung 45W Super Fast Charger:
Samsung’s offering supports a broader range of devices with its PPS (Programmable Power Supply) support, making it more versatile for users who have multiple devices across brands. It also consistently delivers 45W output, which is something Google’s charger struggles with.
Conclusion
The Google 45W USB-C charger is a solid upgrade over its predecessor, offering more power and compatibility with a range of Google devices. However, inconsistent power delivery and a high price tag limit its appeal. For those deeply integrated into the Google ecosystem, it’s a convenient option, but budget-conscious users might want to explore alternatives like Anker or Samsung for better value.
Whether the Google 45W charger is worth it depends on your specific needs. If you’re using the Pixel 9 Pro XL and want the best charging experience possible within Google’s lineup, it’s a worthy consideration. But for the average user, cheaper and faster options are readily available.
